Re: [PATCH 3/5] fstests/MAINTAINERS: add supported mailing list

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



Reviewed-by: Steven French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 6:22 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:14:09AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > The fstests supports different kind of fs testing, better to cc
> > specific fs mailing list for specific fs testing, to get better
> > reviewing points. So record these mailing lists and files related
> > with them in MAINTAINERS file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > If someone mailing list doesn't want to be in cc list of related fstests
> > patch, please reply this email, I'll remove that line.
> >
> > Or if I missed someone mailing list, please feel free to tell me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> >
> >  MAINTAINERS | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 09b1a5a3..620368cb 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -107,6 +107,83 @@ Maintainers List
> >         should send patch to fstests@ at least. Other relevant mailing list
> >         or reviewer or co-maintainer can be in cc list.
> >
> > +BTRFS
> > +L:   linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/btrfs/
> > +F:   common/btrfs
> > +
> > +CEPH
> > +L:   ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/ceph/
> > +F:   common/ceph
> > +
> > +CIFS
> > +L:   linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/cifs
> > +
> > +EXT4
> > +L:   linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/ext4/
> > +F:   common/ext4
> > +
> > +F2FS
> > +L:   linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/f2fs/
> > +F:   common/f2fs
> > +
> > +FSVERITY
> > +L:   fsverity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   common/verity
> > +
> > +FSCRYPT
> > +L:      linux-fscrypt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   common/encrypt
> > +
> > +FS-IDMAPPED
> > +L:   linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   src/vfs/
> > +
> > +NFS
> > +L:   linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/nfs/
> > +F:   common/nfs
> > +
> > +OCFS2
> > +L:   ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/ocfs2/
> > +
> > +OVERLAYFS
> > +L:   linux-unionfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/overlay
> > +F:   common/overlay
> > +
> > +UDF
> > +R:   Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   tests/udf/
> > +
> > +XFS
> > +L:   linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +S:   Supported
> > +F:   common/dump
> > +F:   common/fuzzy
> > +F:   common/inject
> > +F:   common/populate
>
> note that populate and fuzzy apply to ext* as well.
>
> > +F:   common/repair
> > +F:   common/xfs
> > +F:   tests/xfs/
>
> Otherwise looks good to me,
>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --D
>
> > +
> >  ALL
> >  M:   Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >  L:   fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >



-- 
Thanks,

Steve




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux