Re: [PATCH] btrfs/284: list a couple btrfs-progs git commits

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]





On 3/8/23 16:47, Zorro Lang wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
On 07/03/2023 19:38, fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>

This test may often fail when running with btrfs-progs versions not very
recent. The corresponding git commits in btrfs-progs that fix issues
uncovered by this test are:

1) 6f4a51886b37 ("btrfs-progs: receive: fix silent data loss after fall back from encoded write")
     Introduced in btrfs-progs v6.0.2;

2) e3209f8792f4 ("btrfs-progs: receive: fix a corruption when decompressing zstd extents"")
     Introduced in btrfs-progs v6.2.

So add the corresponding _fixed_by_git_commit calls to the test.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
---
   tests/btrfs/284 | 5 +++++
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/btrfs/284 b/tests/btrfs/284
index 0d31e5d9..c6692668 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/284
+++ b/tests/btrfs/284
@@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ _require_test
   _require_scratch_size $(($LOAD_FACTOR * 1 * 1024 * 1024))
   _require_fssum
+_fixed_by_git_commit btrfs-progs e3209f8792f4 \
+	"btrfs-progs: receive: fix a corruption when decompressing zstd extents"
+_fixed_by_git_commit btrfs-progs 6f4a51886b37 \
+	"btrfs-progs: receive: fix silent data loss after fall back from encoded write"
+
   send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
   rm -fr $send_files_dir


Along with this, why not check the btrfs-progs version using
'btrfs --version' and call _not_run()?

Does this case expose some known bugs, right? Or the failures due to some
features missing?


It tests for a bug.

If this case uncovers some known issues, then the failure is expected on unfixed
version. We should let the failure exposing, not hide it by _notrun.

Makes sense.

And the package version is not a good way to jundge if a issue is fixed or a
feature is merged. Due to many downstream packages might merge some upstream
patches independently.


Yeah, I agree. You can guarantee that if btrfs-progs is plain vanilla.

Looks good as it is.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, Anand

Thanks,
Zorro


Thanks, Anand





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux