On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:57:55AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:57 AM Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 01:54:31PM -0800, Leah Rumancik wrote: > > > Many people have developed infrastructure around xfstests. In order to > > > test a setup, it would be helpful to have dummy tests that have > > > consistent test outcomes. Add a new test folder with the following > > > tests: > > > > > > selftest/001 pass > > > selftest/002 fail from output mismatch > > > selftest/003 fail via _fail > > > selftest/004 skip > > > selftest/005 crash > > > selftest/006 hang > > > > > > Also, create two new groups: 'selftest' which includes tests 001-004 and > > > 'dangerous_selftest' which includes tests 005-006. The selftests will > > > run when running all tests but they are not part of the auto group. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v1 -> v2: > > > > > > - change name of folder from 'debug' to 'selftest' > > > - update tags to 'selftest' and 'dangerous_selftest' > > > - add selftest folder to SRC_GROUPS > > > - update copyright tag > > > - add test which _fails > > > > Thanks, this version looks good to me, just each case has a blank line at EOF. > > I'll help to remove those blank lines when I merge this patch. > > > > Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks, > > Zorro > > > > > > > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20230209013143.2586104-1-leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > check | 2 +- > > > doc/group-names.txt | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/001 | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > tests/selftest/001.out | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/002 | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > tests/selftest/002.out | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/003 | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/selftest/003.out | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/004 | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/selftest/004.out | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/005 | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/selftest/005.out | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/006 | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/selftest/006.out | 2 ++ > > > tests/selftest/Makefile | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 15 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > create mode 100755 tests/selftest/001 > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/001.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/selftest/002 > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/002.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/selftest/003 > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/003.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/selftest/004 > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/004.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/selftest/005 > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/005.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/selftest/006 > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/006.out > > > create mode 100644 tests/selftest/Makefile > > > > > > diff --git a/check b/check > > > index 4827532e..c2065cdc 100755 > > > --- a/check > > > +++ b/check > > > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ timestamp=${TIMESTAMP:=false} > > > > > > rm -f $tmp.list $tmp.tmp $tmp.grep $here/$iam.out $tmp.xlist $tmp.report.* $tmp.arglist > > > > > > -SRC_GROUPS="generic shared" > > > +SRC_GROUPS="generic shared selftest" > > I know this is a bit of bikeshedding, > but is it really needed to add selftest/* to SRC_GROUPS and then filter it out > by group? > > Seems to me that it would be simpler to not add any new groups and use > ./check -g selftest/quick -g selftest/dangerous > to run the tests in the selftests subdir. > > Just to be clear, the syntax above already works, nothing new to implement. > > I do not object to adding the selftest groups if others like it better this way. I think it behaves more as expected when it is a part of SRC_GROUPS, but I will probably run these by specifying specific tests - so I don't care much about which groups are used / if it is in SRC_GROUPS or not, and I am happy to change it if others agree. > > It would also be nice to drop a line in README about running selftests. Sure, I can do this. > > Thanks, > Amir.
