Re: run more tests in the auto group

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 06:13:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series adds a more tests to the auto and quick groups so that they
> are run as part of the usual regressions tests.

Thanks, I'm glad to see more stable cases be added into *auto* group.

But as you said btrfs/219 still fails[1] now, so I hope we can use
another patch to fix btrfs/219 singly, even if use _fixed_by_kernel_commit
or _wants_kernel_commit to specify clarify why it's failed now.
Others looks good to me. If you don't mind, I'll merge others, exclude
btrfs/219 (before another patch improve it:)

Thanks,
Zorro

[1]
btrfs/219       [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /root/git/xfstests/results//simpledev/btrfs/219.out.bad)
    --- tests/btrfs/219.out     2022-04-29 23:07:22.997495284 +0800
    +++ /root/git/xfstests/results//simpledev/btrfs/219.out.bad 2023-02-09 22:22:43.447510026 +0800
    @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
     QA output created by 219
    -Silence is golden
    +We couldn't mount the old generation
    +(see /root/git/xfstests/results//simpledev/btrfs/219.full for details)
    +umount: /mnt/test/219.mnt: not mounted.
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /root/git/xfstests/tests/btrfs/219.out /root/git/xfstests/results//simpledev/btrfs/219.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)

> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux