On 20.12.22 11:14, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:19:06AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> On 28.11.22 13:30, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>>> The test-case btrfs/253 tests btrfs' chunk size setting, which is not
>>> available on zoned btrfs, so the test will always fail.
>>>
>>> Skip the test in case of a zoned device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> tests/btrfs/253 | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/253 b/tests/btrfs/253
>>> index fbbb81fae754..99eaee1e7cde 100755
>>> --- a/tests/btrfs/253
>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/253
>>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ alloc_size() {
>>> _supported_fs btrfs
>>> _require_test
>>> _require_scratch
>>> +_require_non_zoned_device "${SCRATCH_DEV}"
>>>
>>> # Delete log file if it exists.
>>> rm -f "${seqres}.full"
>>
>> Ping?
>
> Do I misunderstand something? I think this issue has been fixed long time
> ago, by:
>
> commit 2925f3b7f7738f85aabef4e8fe02f257fce0b786
> Author: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Jul 26 16:57:59 2022 +0900
>
> btrfs/253: skip on zoned mode as we cannot change the chunk size
>
> Which xfstests version do you use? Do you still hit any problems?
Whoopsie, maybe it's time for a rebase.
My bad sorry.
