On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:48:20PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote: > Move the _require_xfs_io_command "falloc" above the > potencially 'expensive' function _get_max_file_size > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- It's not for speeding up this test, I think you're trying to notrun this case on a fs which doesn't support fallocate and sparse file but support truncate syscall. Anyway I don't have objection on this patch. > tests/generic/299 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/generic/299 b/tests/generic/299 > index 8e1a112c..1bb371a3 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/299 > +++ b/tests/generic/299 > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ _require_scratch > _require_odirect > _require_aio > _require_block_device $SCRATCH_DEV > +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc" > > NUM_JOBS=$((4*LOAD_FACTOR)) > BLK_DEV_SIZE=`blockdev --getsz $SCRATCH_DEV` > @@ -96,7 +97,6 @@ filename=buffered-aio-verifier > EOF > > _require_fio $fio_config > -_require_xfs_io_command "falloc" > > _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > _scratch_mount > -- > 2.37.3 >
