On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:31:35PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> This is a regression test for an incorrect
> computation of i_blocks for files larger than
> 4 GiB. Bug was filed for exFAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> tests/generic/694 | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/694.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/694
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/694.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/694 b/tests/generic/694
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..dfd988df
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/694
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 694
> +#
> +# Verify that i_blocks for files larger than 4 GiB have correct
> +# values.
> +#
> +# This test verifies the problem fixed in kernel with commit
> +# 0c336d6e33f4 exfat: fix incorrect loading of i_blocks for large files
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto
> +
> +# Override the default cleanup function.
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -r -f $tmp.* $junk_dir
> +}
> +
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_require_test
> +_require_fs_space $TEST_DIR $((4 * 1024 * 1024)) #kB
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +
> +junk_dir=$TEST_DIR/$seq
> +junk_file=$junk_dir/junk
> +mkdir -p $junk_dir
> +
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -W 0 4G" $junk_file > /dev/null
> +
> +iblocks=`stat -c '%b' $junk_file`
> +
> +_test_cycle_mount
> +
> +iblocks_after_remount=`stat -c '%b' $junk_file`
> +
> +if [ "$iblocks" != "$iblocks_after_remount" ]; then
> + echo "Number of blocks needs to be same: $iblocks, $iblocks_after_remount"
> +fi
> +
> +status=0
> +
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/694.out b/tests/generic/694.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..d1fb84a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/694.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 694
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.37.2
>
