Re: [PATCH] generic: new test to verify selinux label of whiteout inode

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 5:07 PM Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 06:30:10PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >    Sorry for off list email
> >    Please add to whiteout group
>
> Oh, sure, thanks!
>
> The "whiteout" group name is described as (in doc/group-names.txt):
>
>   whiteout                overlayfs whiteout functionality
>
> I think it's not an overlayfs specific group, how about remove the
> "overlayfs" prefix?

The whiteout inode is a vfs construct that was introduced for overlayfs:

       RENAME_WHITEOUT (since Linux 3.18)
              This operation makes sense only for overlay/union filesystem
              implementations.

There is no other known usage for whiteout inode.
You could remove the "overlayfs" prefix, but that would just make the
whiteout context less clear IMO.

>
> BTW, is there anything wrong (about secret?) with this test case, to make
> you have to off list email. This looks like a normal review point ;)
>

Nope, just a technical issue when replying from my mobile.

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux