On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:22:56AM +0200, David Disseldorp wrote:
> These files would otherwise be overwritten.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
Why not fold this into the previous patch?
--D
> ---
> check | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/check b/check
> index 726c83d9..baf336da 100755
> --- a/check
> +++ b/check
> @@ -570,8 +570,17 @@ _stash_test_status() {
> "$report_msg"
> fi
>
> - # only stash result for first failure (triggering loop)
> - ((loop_num > 1)) && return
> + if ((loop_num > 0)); then
> + # retain files which would be overwritten in subsequent reruns
> + for i in "${REPORT_DIR}/${test_seq}.full" \
> + "${REPORT_DIR}/${test_seq}.dmesg" \
> + "${REPORT_DIR}/${test_seq}.out.bad"; do
> + [ -f "$i" ] || continue
> + cp "$i" "${i}.rerun$((loop_num - 1))"
> + done
> + # only stash result for first failure (triggering loop)
> + ((loop_num != 1)) && return
> + fi
>
> case "$test_status" in
> fail)
> --
> 2.35.3
>
