On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:02:16AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 04:40:33PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This patchset adds two tests for verifying the behaviour of Large > > extent counters feature. It also fixes xfs/270 test failure when > > executed on a filesystem with Large extent counters enabled. > > > > Changelog: > > V2 -> V3: > > 1. xfs/270: Fix regular expresssion used in inline awk script to > > match hex number. > > Why did all the patches lose their RVB tags? Hi Darrick, Yes, the V3 lost RVB tags, but I saw your RVB on last version, and this V3 only improved a string, so I reviewed it and added your RVB back. I've merged this patchset. Thanks for your review again :) Thanks, Zorro > > --D > > > V1 -> V2: > > 1. xfs/270: Replace bashisms with inline awk scripts. > > 2. Use _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported helper in _require_xfs_nrext64(). > > 3. Remove invocation of $XFS_INFO_PROG from _require_xfs_nrext64(). > > 4. Use xfs_db's 'path' command instead of saving test file's inode > > number in the two new tests introduced by the patchset. > > > > Chandan Babu R (4): > > xfs/270: Fix ro mount failure when nrext64 option is enabled > > common/xfs: Add helper to check if nrext64 option is supported > > xfs: Verify that the correct inode extent counters are updated > > with/without nrext64 > > xfs: Verify correctness of upgrading an fs to support large extent > > counters > > > > common/xfs | 12 +++++ > > tests/xfs/270 | 26 ++++++++++- > > tests/xfs/270.out | 1 - > > tests/xfs/547 | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/xfs/547.out | 13 ++++++ > > tests/xfs/548 | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/xfs/548.out | 12 +++++ > > 7 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/547 > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/547.out > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/548 > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/548.out > > > > -- > > 2.35.1 > > >
