Re: [PATCH 6/8] fstests: consolidate no cleanup test setup

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 2:42 PM Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Many of the XFS fuzzer tests define a "no cleanup" cleanup function.
> Consolidate this in common/preamble and deduplicate all the tests
> using this setup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  common/preamble | 9 +++++++++
>  tests/xfs/083   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/085   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/086   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/087   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/088   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/089   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/091   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/093   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/097   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/098   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/099   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/100   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/101   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/102   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/105   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/112   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/113   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/117   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/120   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/123   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/124   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/125   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/126   | 5 -----
>  tests/xfs/130   | 5 -----
>  25 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
>

I propose to use a dedicated helper _unregister_cleanup to opt out
of _cleanup and still leave _cleanup implicit for all the rest of the tests,
but I will not stop merging this cleanup on account of this suggestion.
It could be done by a followup cleanup as well, so unless you want to
take my suggestion

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux