Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: test repair with corrupted sectors interleaved over multiple mirrors

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 06:26:26PM +0530, Anand Jain wrote:
>  Agreed this method is unreliable. But there is no other choice.
>  Unless we integrated [1] patch in the ML.
>
>  [1] btrfs: introduce new read_policy device
>
>  [1] is more reliable. You can set which mirrored device to read.

I actually thought about something like this as the reliable way
to hit a mirror.  Besides testing I could also thing of some other
use cases for it where you want to avoid a mirror by default for some
reason (e.g. because it is network attached store while the other
one is local).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux