在 2022/5/10 20:12, Amir Goldstein 写道:
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:05 PM libaokun (A) <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 2022/5/10 15:51, Amir Goldstein 写道:
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:50 AM Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The local.config of overlay+tmpfs is as follows:
```local.config.example
export FSTYP=tmpfs
export TEST_DEV=tmpfs_test
export TEST_DIR=/tmp/test
export SCRATCH_DEV=tmpfs_scratch
export SCRATCH_MNT=/tmp/scratch
```
Run `./check -overlay tests` to execute test case on overlay+tmpfs.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V1->V2:
Fix the bug in version V1 and fix the issue in cycle_mount.
V2->V3:
Merge two patches into one completed patch.
V1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/patch/20220424063751.1067376-1-libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx/
V2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/cover/20220507094524.949615-1-libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx/
common/config | 12 ++++++------
common/overlay | 2 +-
common/rc | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
index 1033b890..d5953176 100644
--- a/common/config
+++ b/common/config
@@ -610,15 +610,15 @@ _overlay_config_override()
[ ! -d "$TEST_DEV" ] || export OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR="$TEST_DEV"
[ ! -d "$SCRATCH_DEV" ] || export OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT="$SCRATCH_DEV"
+ # Config file may specify base fs type, but we obay -overlay flag
+ [ "$FSTYP" == overlay ] || export OVL_BASE_FSTYP="$FSTYP"
+ export FSTYP=overlay
+
# 2. SCRATCH/TEST_DEV point to the base fs partitions. In this case,
# the new OVL_BASE_SCRATCH/TEST_DEV/MNT vars are set to the values
# of the configured base fs and SCRATCH/TEST_DEV vars are set to the
# overlayfs base and mount dirs inside base fs mount.
- [ -b "$TEST_DEV" ] || [ -c "$TEST_DEV" ] || return 0
-
- # Config file may specify base fs type, but we obay -overlay flag
- [ "$FSTYP" == overlay ] || export OVL_BASE_FSTYP="$FSTYP"
- export FSTYP=overlay
+ [ -b "$TEST_DEV" ] || [ -c "$TEST_DEV" ] || [ "$OVL_BASE_FSTYP" == tmpfs ] || return 0
# Store original base fs vars
export OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV="$TEST_DEV"
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ _overlay_config_override()
export TEST_DIR="$OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR/$OVL_MNT"
export MOUNT_OPTIONS="$OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS"
- [ -b "$SCRATCH_DEV" ] || [ -c "$SCRATCH_DEV" ] || return 0
+ [ -b "$SCRATCH_DEV" ] || [ -c "$SCRATCH_DEV" ] || [ "$OVL_BASE_FSTYP" == tmpfs ] || return 0
# Store original base fs vars
export OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_DEV="$SCRATCH_DEV"
diff --git a/common/overlay b/common/overlay
index fff67ba1..c4e7ee58 100644
--- a/common/overlay
+++ b/common/overlay
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ _overlay_base_mount()
return 1
fi
- _mount $* $dev $mnt
+ _mount -t $OVL_BASE_FSTYP $* $dev $mnt
_idmapped_mount $dev $mnt
}
diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index 553ae350..ca465438 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -410,10 +410,19 @@ _scratch_cycle_mount()
{
local opts="$1"
- if [ "$FSTYP" = tmpfs ]; then
- _scratch_remount "$opts"
- return
- fi
+ case "$FSTYP" in
+ tmpfs)
+ _scratch_remount "$opts"
+ return
+ ;;
+ overlay)
+ if [ "$OVL_BASE_FSTYP" = tmpfs ]; then
+ _scratch_remount "$opts"
That doesn't look right.
_scrtach_cycle_mount is important for several overlay tests and there
is no reason to
skip it if base fs is tmpfs.
What you need to do is cycle mount the overlay without cycle mounting
the base fs.
You could do something like this:
local unmounted
...
overlay)
if [ "$OVL_BASE_FSTYP" = tmpfs ]; then
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
unmounted=true
fi
;;
esac
...
[ "$unmounted" = true ] || _scratch_unmount
_try_scratch_mount "$opts" || _fail "cycle mount failed"
}
There are some overlay tests that open code this pattern like overlay/077:
# Remove the lower directory and mount overlay again to create
# a "former merge dir"
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
rm -rf $lowerdir/former
_scratch_mount
So _scratch_mount is expected to work just fine when base fs is already mounted
assuming that _check_mounted_on works correctly with tmpfs.
Thanks,
Amir.
.
Thank you very much for your advice.
I will send a patch V4 with the changes suggested by you.
To state the obvious that I did not say, please do the same with
_test_cycle_mount
Thanks,
Amir.
.
Ok, got it! Thank a milion!
--
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.
