On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 05:37:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:35:13PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > Sure, I won't do that wilfully, just try to ask how we can improve this > > huge and 'keep growing' idmapped-mounts.c, not tend to remove the whole > > idmapped-mount testing coverage :) > > It might just be time to split that file up into a few ones if there > is a sensible split. I'll let Christian think about that, though. Yep, I agree. I think we need to at least rename it to reflect is vfs generic nature and then split it into separate test binaries. I'll think about a good approach.
