(Resend due to previous email being rejected. Sorry) Thanks Darrick. I will replace the "_require_scratch_reflink" with "_require_scratch_dedupe" in v2 patch. -Boyang On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:11 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 06:08:41PM +0800, bxue@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Boyang Xue <bxue@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Boyang Xue <bxue@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/generic/674 | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/674 b/tests/generic/674 > > index bf0bcffb..7e5e4e29 100755 > > --- a/tests/generic/674 > > +++ b/tests/generic/674 > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ _begin_fstest auto clone quick > > _supported_fs generic > > _require_user > > _require_scratch_reflink > > +_require_scratch_dedupe > > I think you could replace the _require_scratch_reflink with > _require_scratch_dedupe here, right? I probably copypasta'd this. > > --D > > > _require_xfs_io_command dedupe > > > > _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full > > -- > > 2.27.0 > > >
