Re: [PATCH] xfs: test xfsdump with bind-mounted filesystem

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 03:07:01PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:34:09PM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> > From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > commit 25195eb ("xfsdump: handle bind mount target") introduced
> > a bug of xfsdump which doesn't store the files to the dump file
> > correctly when the root inode number is changed.
> > 
> > The commit 25195eb is reverted, and commit 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept
> > bind mount targets") which is in xfsdump v3.1.10 fixes the bug to reject
> > the filesystem if it's bind-mounted.
> > 
> > Test that xfsdump can reject the bind-mounted filesystem.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tests/xfs/544     | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/xfs/544.out |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/544
> >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/544.out
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/544 b/tests/xfs/544
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..1d586ebc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/544
> > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2022 Fujitsu Limited. All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 544
> > +#
> > +# Regression test for commit:
> > +# 0717c1c ("xfsdump: intercept bind mount targets")
> > +
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest auto dump
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > +	_cleanup_dump
> 
> Is this really needed?
> 
> > +	cd /
> > +	rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > +	$UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null
> > +	rmdir $mntpnt1/dir 2> /dev/null
> > +	$UMOUNT_PROG $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null
> > +	rmdir $mntpnt2 2> /dev/null
> > +	rmdir $mntpnt1 2> /dev/null
> > +	[ -n "$loopdev" ] && _destroy_loop_device $loopdev
> > +	rm -f "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Import common functions.
> > +. ./common/filter
> > +. ./common/dump
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +
> > +_supported_fs xfs
> > +
> > +mntpnt1=$TEST_DIR/MNT1
> > +mntpnt2=$TEST_DIR/MNT2
> > +
> > +
> > +# Set up
> > +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -s size=4096 -b size=4096 \
> > +	-dfile,name=$TEST_DIR/fsfile,size=8649728b,sunit=1024,swidth=2048 \
> > +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
> 
> Are "-s size=4096 -b size=4096 -d sunit=1024,swidth=2048" necessary? If so, better
> to add comments to explain why they're needed.
> 
> > +
> > +loopdev=$(_create_loop_device "$TEST_DIR"/fsfile)
> 
> Is loopdev necessary? If you need mkfs, can we just use SCRATCH_DEV, and bind $SCRATCH_MNT/someonedir
> on $TEST_DIR/someonedir ? E.g:
> 
> _cleanup()
> {
> 	$UMOUNT_PROG $TEST_DIR/dest 2> /dev/null
> 	cd /
> 	rm -r -f $tmp.*
> }
> 
> _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full
> _scratch_mount
> mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/src
> mkdir $TEST_DIR/dest
> $MOUNT_PROG --bind $SCRATCH_MNT/src $TEST_DIR/dest || _fail "Bind mount failed"
> $XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $TEST_DIR/dest >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && \
> 	echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed."
> 
> echo "Silence is golden"
> ...
> 
> If you don't need mkfs, you can use $TEST_DIR (e.g. $TEST_DIR/src and $TEST_DIR/dest) to
> be bind mount source and target. Due to this case just trys to test xfsdump a bind mount,
> and make sure dump failed as expected. Am I right?

Thank you for pointing it out! Yes, you're right.
I'll remove the unnecessary parts and post the v2.

Thanks!
Masa

> 
> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
> > +
> > +mkdir $mntpnt1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1\" failed"
> > +
> > +_mount $loopdev $mntpnt1
> > +mkdir $mntpnt1/dir >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt1/dir\" failed"
> > +mkdir $mntpnt2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkdir \"$mntpnt2\" failed"
> > +
> > +
> > +# Test
> > +echo "*** dump with bind-mounted test ***" >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +mount -o bind $mntpnt1/dir $mntpnt2
> > +
> > +$XFSDUMP_PROG -L session -M test -f $tmp.dump $mntpnt2 \
> > +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 && echo "dump with bind-mounted should be failed, but passed."
> > +
> > +echo "Silence is golden"
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/544.out b/tests/xfs/544.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..fc7ebff3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/544.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +QA output created by 544
> > +Silence is golden
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux