Re: [PATCH 0/7] fstests: fix _scratch_mkfs_sized failure handling

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Jan 24, 2022 / 20:10, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> When generic/204 is run for btrfs-zoned filesystem on zoned block devices with
> GB size order, it takes very long time to complete. The test case creates 115MiB
> filesystem on the scratch device and fills files in it within decent run time.
> However, with btrfs-zoned condition, the test case creates filesystem as large
> as the device size and it takes very long time to fill it all. Three causes were
> identified for the long run time, and this series addresses them.
> 
> The first cause is mixed mode option that _scratch_mkfs_sized helper function
> adds to mkfs.btrfs. This option was added for both regular btrfs and
> zoned-btrfs. However, zoned-btrfs does not support mixed mode. The mkfs with
> mixed mode fails and results in _scratch_mkfs_sized failure. The mixed mode
> shall not be specified for btrfs-zoned filesystem.
> 
> The second cause is no check of return code from _scratch_mkfs_sized. The test
> case generic/204 calls both _scratch_mkfs and _scratch_mkfs_sized, and does not
> check return code from them. If _scratch_mkfs succeeds and _scratch_mkfs_sized
> fails, the scratch device still has valid filesystem created by _scratch_mkfs.
> Following test workload can be executed without failure, but the filesystem
> does not have the size specified for _scratch_mkfs_sized. The return code of
> _scratch_mkfs_sized shall be checked to catch the mkfs failure.
> 
> The third cause is unnecessary call of the _scratch_mkfs helper function in the
> test case generic/204. This helper function is called together with _filter_mkfs
> helper function to obtain block size of the test target filesystem. However, the
> _filter_mkfs function works only for xfs, and does nothing for other filesystems
> including btrfs. Such preparation unique to xfs shall be done only for xfs.
> 
> In this series, the first patch addresses the first cause. Following three
> patches address the second cause. They cover not only generic/204 but also
> other test cases which have the same problem. The last three patches address the
> third problem. Two of them are preparation patches to clarify that the function
> _filter_mkfs is xfs unique. And the last patch modifies generic/204 so that xfs
> unique test preparation are run only for xfs.
> 
> Shin'ichiro Kawasaki (7):
>   common/rc: fix btrfs mixed mode usage in _scratch_mkfs_sized
>   generic/{171,172,173,174,204}: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
>   ext4/021: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
>   xfs/015: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
>   common: rename _filter_mkfs to _xfs_filter_mkfs
>   common: move _xfs_filter_mkfs from common/filter to common/xfs
>   generic/204: do xfs unique preparation only for xfs

This is a gentle reminder to ask review by fstests community.

Let me add CC to linux-btrfs list, since the first patch is for btrfs testing.

-- 
Best Regards,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux