Re: [PATCH v3] common: handle ceph's new mount syntax

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 12:54:26PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Cephfs is introducing a new mount device syntax. Fix the fstests
> infrastructure to handle the new syntax correctly.
> 
> Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

It looks good to me now.

Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  common/config |  8 ++++++++
>  common/rc     | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> v2: more rigorous check for ceph mount device in _check_device
> v3: consolidate multiple grep commands into single regex
> 
> diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> index e0a5c5df58ff..2b357746476b 100644
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -537,6 +537,14 @@ _check_device()
>  		# 9p and virtiofs mount tags are just plain strings, so anything is allowed
>  		# tmpfs doesn't use mount source, ignore
>  		;;
> +	ceph)
> +		# ceph has two different possible syntaxes for mount devices. The
> +		# network URL check above catches the legacy syntax. Check for the
> +		# new-style syntax here.
> +		if ( echo $dev | grep -qEv "=/" ); then
> +			_fatal "common/config: $name ($dev) is not a valid ceph mount string"
> +		fi
> +		;;
>  	overlay)
>  		if [ ! -d "$dev" ]; then
>  			_fatal "common/config: $name ($dev) is not a directory for overlay"
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index f8afd93d656c..c087875a4251 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck()
>  			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT"
>  		fi
>  		;;
> -	nfs*|ceph)
> +	nfs*)
>  		echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1
>  		if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then
>  			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV"
> @@ -1601,6 +1601,15 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck()
>  			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT"
>  		fi
>  		;;
> +	ceph)
> +		echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -qE "=/|:/" > /dev/null 2>&1
> +		if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then
> +			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV"
> +		fi
> +		if [ ! -d "$SCRATCH_MNT" ]; then
> +			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT"
> +		fi
> +		;;
>  	pvfs2)
>  		echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "://" > /dev/null 2>&1
>  		if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then
> @@ -1783,7 +1792,7 @@ _require_test()
>  			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR"
>  		fi
>  		;;
> -	nfs*|ceph)
> +	nfs*)
>  		echo $TEST_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1
>  		if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then
>  			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DEV"
> @@ -1792,6 +1801,15 @@ _require_test()
>  			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR"
>  		fi
>  		;;
> +	ceph)
> +		echo $TEST_DEV | grep -qE "=/|:/" > /dev/null 2>&1
> +		if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then
> +			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DEV"
> +		fi
> +		if [ ! -d "$TEST_DIR" ]; then
> +			_notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR"
> +		fi
> +		;;
>  	cifs)
>  		echo $TEST_DEV | grep -q "//" > /dev/null 2>&1
>  		if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then
> -- 
> 2.33.1
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux