On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:15:38AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote: > This adds support for using the xattr implementation in liburing. > > Patch 1: fstress: add suport for using liburing setxattr > Uses the liburing setxattr implementation in fsstress. > > Patch 2: fstress: add suport for using liburing getxattr > Uses the liburing getxattr implementation in fsstress. > > There are two additional patch series related to this: > - io_uring: add xattr support > - liburing: add xattr support I think it may take some time for distributions to pick up this liburing xattr support, and before that we fail to compile fsstress due to undefined functions as io_uring_prep_setxattr(). Maybe we should check if current liburing supports xattr and otherwise use our local implementation? So this patchset won't be blocked. Thanks, Eryu > > --- > V5: - fix some whitespace issues, order enum definition in correct > position and rebase > V4: - fix a whitespace/tab issue > V3: - Rebased patch series. > V2: - Introduce dedicated functions for uring getxattr and > uring setxattr, so they are not automatically linked > in if liburing is available. > > Stefan Roesch (2): > fstress: add suport for using liburing setxattr > fstress: add suport for using liburing getxattr > > ltp/fsstress.c | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: 58e358032ac1f50acdb66615c04875d5375a6053 > -- > 2.30.2
