On 13.09.21 г. 16:40, Filipe Manana wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:35 PM Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> All but this test use 'subvol' to designate they relate to btrfs >> subvolume functionality. For the sake of consistency make btrfs/233 >> also be part of 'subvol' rather than 'subvolume'. This brings no >> functional changes. > > There's already a pending patch for this, which also fixes the same > inconsistency for btrfs/245: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/patch/163062676513.1579659.12516104685003091290.stgit@magnolia/ Thanks, I have missed it. Since Darick's patch is fuller hopefully it will be merged. So this one can be ignored. > > Thanks. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> tests/btrfs/233 | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/233 b/tests/btrfs/233 >> index f3e3762c6951..6a4144433073 100755 >> --- a/tests/btrfs/233 >> +++ b/tests/btrfs/233 >> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ >> # performed. >> # >> . ./common/preamble >> -_begin_fstest auto quick subvolume >> +_begin_fstest auto quick subvol >> >> # Override the default cleanup function. >> _cleanup() >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> > >
