Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Extend idmapped mount testsuite

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 12:47:57PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hey everyone,
> 
> This is v4 with only a minimal change to getopt_long_only(). The rest is
> identical. In v3 the changes requested by Christoph and his Reviewed-bys
> added. I've also added Josef's Reviewed-by for the newly added btrfs
> specific idmapped mount testsuite. There are no major changes to v2.
> 
> This time around I've put everyone in To: to make sure that they receive
> all patches. The list apparently still refues patches if they are fairly
> huge. The series can be pulled from three locations:
> 
> git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/xfstests-dev fs.idmapped.nested_userns
> git@xxxxxxxxxx:brauner/xfstests.git fs.idmapped.nested_userns
> git@xxxxxxxxxx:brauner/xfstests.git fs.idmapped.nested_userns
> 
> This adds three new tests:
> - a regression test for vfs capabilities
> - a new test with nested and complex idmapping layouts
> - a new btrfs specific idmapped mount testsuite
> 
> Since v2 patches to support idmapped mounts on btrfs have been merged
> into btrfs' for-next tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=f691ae1e0bc591df5e9897387d726adbb440fc4c
> and so are on track to be included for v5.15.  I'd like to get the btrfs
> tests merged now so linux-next can be tested with the them. I hope
> that's ok.
> 
> I ran:
> git rebase -i -x "make -j4 clean && make -j4 && sudo ./check -g idmapped" HEAD~8
> on the whole series. Everthing passes.

Hey Eryu,

Sorry for asking but it's been a few months. Did you miss this series
intentionally this iteration? After last weeks mail I added all
Acks/Reviewed-bys that came in so this should hopefully be good to go.

I'd really like to see these new tests going in rather soon as their
quite crucial to ensure correct functionality especially since we're
seeing new filesystems making use of idmapped mounts.

Thanks!
Christian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux