Re: [PATCH] tests/xfs: check avail blocks after log recovery on ro mount

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:49:38AM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> And followed by a rw mount.
> 
> Suggested-by:  Donald Douwsma <ddouwsma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/175     | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/175.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/175
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/175.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/175 b/tests/xfs/175
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..2a79a3d4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/175
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2021 RedHat All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 175
> +#
> +# Testcase for kernel commit:
> +#   50d25484bebe xfs: sync lazy sb accounting on quiesce of read-only mounts
> +#
> +# After shutdown and readonly mount, a following read-write mount would
> +# get wrong number of available blocks.

That's a description of the reproduction strategy, but the fault was
that unmounting the log on a readonly filesystem doesn't log the sb
counters.  I think it's worth mentioning that in the description.

Thanks for putting together a test case though. :)

> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest shutdown auto quick
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> +mount $SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT

_scratch_mount ?

Also, you probably want

_xfs_force_bdev data $SCRATCH_MNT

to force testfile to be created on the data device if the test runner
passed -d rtinherit=1 in MKFS_OPTS.

> +
> +# Write test file
> +ls > $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
> +df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1

$DF_PROG

> +
> +# Shutdown
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "shutdown -f" $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +# Mount ReadOnly
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mount -oro
> +df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +# Umount and mount rw
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Get fdblocks before repair
> +fdb1=$(df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT | tail -1)
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> +# Repair
> +_repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> +# Re-mount
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Get fdblocks after repair
> +fdb2=$(df --output=avail $SCRATCH_MNT | tail -1)
> +
> +echo fdb1 $fdb1 fdb2 $fdb2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +
> +[ $fdb1 -ne $fdb2 ] && echo Wrong fdblocks: $fdb1 and $fdb2

Looks reasonable enough to me.

--D

> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/175.out b/tests/xfs/175.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3b4af34b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/175.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 175
> +Silence is golden
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux