Hello, this is a quick attempt to finish what was discussed in thread: generic/453: Exclude filenames that are not supported by exfat https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg16328.html Based on Darrick's comments: """ TBH I think these tests (g/453 and g/454) are probably only useful for filesystems that allow unrestricted byte streams for names. """ and_require_names_are_bytes() """ Nowadays with wider testing of other filesystems (thanks, Red Hat!) we should hide these behind _require_names_are_bytes or move them to tests/xfs/. """ Changes in V2: * Added description for _require_names_are_bytes() * Added _require_names_are_bytes() to g/454 as well * fixed typo s/now/not/ Changes in V3: * Added f2fs to the list of FSs that treat file names as unrestricted byte streams Pavel Reichl (1): generic/{453,454}: Don't run for FSs restricting names common/rc | 13 +++++++++++++ tests/generic/453 | 1 + tests/generic/454 | 1 + 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+) -- 2.31.1
