Re: [ANNOUNCE] fstests: master branch updated to 73030114397b

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:02:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:33:54PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The master branch of the xfstests repository at:
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git
> > 
> > have just been updated. The only thing in this update is the "move test group
> > lists into test files" patchset from Darrick J. Wong, which moves each test's
> > group information into the test itself, and automatically generate the group
> > files as part of the make process. Please refer to the description quated from
> > Darrick's PR cover letter below [1].
> > 
> > This may break some old habits while using fstests, some heads up below
> ....
> > And this update probably may introduce regressions and bugs, please help report
> > and/or fix bugs if you hit any.
> 
> Yup, generic/019 is the first regression I've noticed:
> 
> generic/019 46s ... - output mismatch (see
> /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/019.out.bad)
> --- tests/generic/019.out   2014-04-08 09:43:28.506999723 +1000
> +++ /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/019.out.bad
> 2021-06-28 10:39:30.653077176 +1000
> @@ -7,3 +7,5 @@
> Force SCRATCH_DEV device failure
> Make SCRATCH_DEV device operable again
> Disallow global fail_make_request feature
> +/home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/tests/generic/019: line 56: poweron_scratch_dev: command not found
> +Disallow global fail_make_request feature
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/tests/generic/019.out /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/generic/019.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> 
> I suspect that _cleanup output on EXIT is now being captured to the
> $seq.out file, because I can't see how this _cleanup function ever
> worked - poweron_scratch_dev() doesn't exist and AFAICT it never
> has....

Yeah, I noticed that this test has been busted forever. :(

The test also probably needs to ulimit -c 0 so that fstests won't
complain about corefiles when fio dies after the fs goes down.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux