Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfs/117: fix fragility in this fuzz test

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:56:58PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This fuzz test has some fragility problems -- it doesn't do anything to
> guarantee that the inodes that it checks for EFSCORRUPTED are the same
> ones that it fuzzed, and it doesn't explicitly try to avoid victimizing
> inodes in the same chunk as the root directory.  As a result, this test
> fails annoyingly frequently.
> 
> Fix both of these problems and get rid of the confusingly named TESTDIR
> variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux