On 4/7/21 8:03 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/30/21 5:00 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote: >> Update the test so it can be run even for exfat which has 2 seconds >> granularity for access_time and does not have a timestamp for >> metadata change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This looks a whole lot like what I was playing with earlier. :) good :-) > > Can you run it say 20 times in a row, and make sure that you don't get > spurious failures by sleeping for /exactly/ the atime granularity? I tried that for tens of times and no failure. However, since sleep() does not require integer as the parameter, in the next revision I'll propose something as a 2.1 instead of the 2 to be on the safe side, OK? > > Thanks, > -Eric >
