Re: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:22:51 +0000
Cc: guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, guan@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210324181748.GK1670408@magnolia>
References: <161647318241.3429609.1862044070327396092.stgit@magnolia> <161647319905.3429609.14862078528489327236.stgit@magnolia> <20210324181748.GK1670408@magnolia>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:17:48AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The device name of a secondary storage device isn't all that important,
> but the size is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHSET 0/3] populate: fix a few bugs with fs pre-population
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] common: Escape SCRATCH_DEV variable
Previous by thread: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
Next by thread: [PATCHSET 0/3] fstests: test kernel regressions fixed in 5.12
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux