On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 12:17:44AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 12:17:55AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:23:00PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > This adds a stress testcase to shrink free space as much as > > > possible in the last AG with background fsstress workload. > > > > > > The expectation is that no crash happens with expected output. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Note that I don't use _fill_fs instead, since fill_scratch here mainly to > > > eat 125M to make fsstress more effectively, rather than fill data as > > > much as possible. > > > > As Darrick had given lots of review points to this case, I just have > > 2 picky questions as below:) > > > > > > > > tests/xfs/991 | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/xfs/991.out | 8 +++ > > > tests/xfs/group | 1 + > > > 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/991 > > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/991.out > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/991 b/tests/xfs/991 > > > new file mode 100755 > > > index 00000000..22a5ac81 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/991 > > > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ > > > +#! /bin/bash > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +# Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > > +# > > > +# FS QA Test 991 > > > +# > > > +# XFS online shrinkfs stress test > > > +# > > > +# This test attempts to shrink unused space as much as possible with > > > +# background fsstress workload. It will decrease the shrink size if > > > +# larger size fails. And totally repeat 2 * TIME_FACTOR times. > > > +# > > > +seq=`basename $0` > > > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > > > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > > > + > > > +here=`pwd` > > > +tmp=/tmp/$$ > > > +status=1 # failure is the default! > > > +trap "rm -f $tmp.*; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > > > + > > > +# get standard environment, filters and checks > > > +. ./common/rc > > > +. ./common/filter > > > + > > > +create_scratch() > > > +{ > > > + _scratch_mkfs_xfs $@ | tee -a $seqres.full | \ > > > + _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs >/dev/null > > > + . $tmp.mkfs > > > + > > > + if ! _try_scratch_mount 2>/dev/null; then > > > + echo "failed to mount $SCRATCH_DEV" > > > + exit 1 > > > + fi > > > + > > > + # fix the reserve block pool to a known size so that the enospc > > > + # calculations work out correctly. > > > + _scratch_resvblks 1024 > /dev/null 2>&1 > > > +} > > > + > > > +fill_scratch() > > > +{ > > > + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "resvsp 0 ${1}" $SCRATCH_MNT/resvfile > > > +} > > > + > > > +stress_scratch() > > > +{ > > > + procs=3 > > > + nops=$((1000 * LOAD_FACTOR)) > > > + # -w ensures that the only ops are ones which cause write I/O > > > + FSSTRESS_ARGS=`_scale_fsstress_args -d $SCRATCH_MNT -w -p $procs \ > > > + -n $nops $FSSTRESS_AVOID` > > > + $FSSTRESS_PROG $FSSTRESS_ARGS >> $seqres.full 2>&1 & > > > +} > > > + > > > +# real QA test starts here > > > +_supported_fs xfs > > > +_require_scratch > > > +_require_xfs_shrink > > > +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc" > > > > Do I miss something? I only found you use xfs_io "resvsp", why you need "falloc" cmd? > > As I mentioned before, the testcase was derived from xfs/104 with some > modification. > > At a quick glance, this line was added by commit 09e94f84d929 ("xfs: don't > assume preallocation is always supported on XFS"). I have no more background > yet. Why not use xfs_io falloc in the test? fallocate is the successor to resvsp. --D > > > > > + > > > +rm -f $seqres.full > > > +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | tee -a $seqres.full | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs > > > +. $tmp.mkfs # extract blocksize and data size for scratch device > > > + > > > +decsize=`expr 42 \* 1048576` # shrink in chunks of this size at most > > > +endsize=`expr 125 \* 1048576` # stop after shrinking this big > > > +[ `expr $endsize / $dbsize` -lt $dblocks ] || _notrun "Scratch device too small" > > > + > > > +nags=2 > > > +totalcount=$((2 * TIME_FACTOR)) > > > + > > > +while [ $totalcount -gt 0 ]; do > > > + size=`expr 1010 \* 1048576` # 1010 megabytes initially > > > + logblks=$(_scratch_find_xfs_min_logblocks -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags}) > > > + > > > + create_scratch -lsize=${logblks}b -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags} > > > + > > > + for i in `seq 125 -1 90`; do > > > + fillsize=`expr $i \* 1048576` > > > + out="$(fill_scratch $fillsize 2>&1)" > > > + echo "$out" | grep -q 'No space left on device' && continue > > > + test -n "${out}" && echo "$out" > > > + break > > > + done > > > + > > > + while [ $size -gt $endsize ]; do > > > + stress_scratch > > > + sleep 1 > > > + > > > + decb=`expr $decsize / $dbsize` # in data blocks > > > + while [ $decb -gt 0 ]; do > > > + sizeb=`expr $size / $dbsize - $decb` > > > + > > > + $XFS_GROWFS_PROG -D ${sizeb} $SCRATCH_MNT \ > > > + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 && break > > > + > > > + [ $decb -gt 100 ] && decb=`expr $decb + $RANDOM % 10` > > > + decb=`expr $decb / 2` > > > + done > > > + > > > + wait > > > + [ $decb -eq 0 ] && break > > > + > > > + # get latest dblocks > > > + $XFS_INFO_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.growfs >/dev/null > > > + . $tmp.growfs > > > + > > > + size=`expr $dblocks \* $dbsize` > > > + _scratch_cycle_mount > > > + done > > > + > > > + _scratch_unmount > > > + _repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full > > > + totalcount=`expr $totalcount - 1` > > > +done > > > + > > > +echo "*** done" > > > +status=0 > > > +exit > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/991.out b/tests/xfs/991.out > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 00000000..e8209672 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/991.out > > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > > > +QA output created by 991 > > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks > > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT > > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X > > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX > > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX > > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX > > > +*** done > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group > > > index a7981b67..b479ed3a 100644 > > > --- a/tests/xfs/group > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/group > > > @@ -526,3 +526,4 @@ > > > 526 auto quick mkfs > > > 527 auto quick quota > > > 990 auto quick growfs > > > +991 auto quick growfs > > > > Is this "stress" test case really "quick" :) > > ok, will update. > > Thanks, > Gao Xiang > > > > > > -- > > > 2.27.0 > > > > > >