On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:27 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:47:32PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:24 PM Darrick J. Wong
> > <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Teach fstests to extract timestamp limits of a filesystem using the new
> > > xfs_db timelimit command.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > common/rc | 2 +-
> > > common/xfs | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > tests/xfs/911 | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/xfs/911.out | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > tests/xfs/group | 1 +
> > > 5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/911
> > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/911.out
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > > index 41f93047..162d957a 100644
> > > --- a/common/rc
> > > +++ b/common/rc
> > > @@ -2029,7 +2029,7 @@ _filesystem_timestamp_range()
> > > echo "0 $u32max"
> > > ;;
> > > xfs)
> > > - echo "$s32min $s32max"
> > > + _xfs_timestamp_range "$device"
> > > ;;
> > > btrfs)
> > > echo "$s64min $s64max"
> > > diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> > > index e548a0a1..19ccee03 100644
> > > --- a/common/xfs
> > > +++ b/common/xfs
> > > @@ -994,3 +994,17 @@ _require_xfs_scratch_inobtcount()
> > > _notrun "inobtcount not supported by scratch filesystem type: $FSTYP"
> > > _scratch_unmount
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +_xfs_timestamp_range()
> > > +{
> > > + local use_db=0
> > > + local dbprog="$XFS_DB_PROG $device"
>
> Heh, device isn't defined, I'll fix that.
>
> > > + test "$device" = "$SCRATCH_DEV" && dbprog=_scratch_xfs_db
> > > +
> > > + $dbprog -f -c 'help timelimit' | grep -v -q 'not found' && use_db=1
> > > + if [ $use_db -eq 0 ]; then
> > > + echo "-$((1<<31)) $(((1<<31)-1))"
> >
> > This embodies an assumption that the tested filesystem does not have
> > bigtime enabled if xfs_db tool is not uptodate.
>
> If the xfs_db tool doesn't support the timelimit command then it doesn't
> support formatting with bigtime. I don't think it's reasonable to
> expect to be able to run fstests on a test filesystem that xfsprogs
> doesn't support. Hence it's fine to output the old limits if the
> timelimit command doesn't exist.
ok.
>
> > Maybe it makes sense, but it may be safer to return "-1 -1" and not_run
> > generic/402 if xfs_db is not uptodate, perhaps with an extra message
> > hinting the user to upgrade xfs_db.
>
> TBH it boggles my mind that there *still* is no way to ask the kernel
> for the supported timestamp range of a mounted filesystem. The
> timelimit command and this mess in fstests was supposed to be a
> temporary workaround that would (in my ideal world) have become
> unnecessary before this landed, but ... ugh.
>
Oh well, consider this
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Amir.
