On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:44:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This test uses an open-coded call to mkfs, so we need to disable the > external devices so that _scratch_xfs_db doesn't get confused. We also > disable the post-check fsck because it's run by the parent ./check > program, which won't know that we didn't use the external devices. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Good to me, Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> > tests/xfs/424 | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/424 b/tests/xfs/424 > index 66d79458..4907cf0f 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/424 > +++ b/tests/xfs/424 > @@ -47,7 +47,13 @@ rm -f $seqres.full > # Modify as appropriate > _supported_os Linux > _supported_fs xfs > -_require_scratch > + > +# Since we have an open-coded mkfs call, disable the external devices and > +# don't let the post-check fsck actually run since it'll trip over us not > +# using the external devices. > +_require_scratch_nocheck > +export SCRATCH_LOGDEV= > +export SCRATCH_RTDEV= > > echo "Silence is golden." > >
