On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 07:41:32PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote: > Add reproducer for a bug on ubifs where listxattr() copies > the newly created xattr names regardless of the remaining > buffer size, fails the assertion of used buffer size, > and may corrupt buffer memory. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: accommodate f2fs by reducing the number of created xattrs for f2fs > > tests/generic/998 | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/generic/998.out | 2 ++ > tests/generic/group | 1 + > 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/generic/998 > create mode 100644 tests/generic/998.out > > diff --git a/tests/generic/998 b/tests/generic/998 > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..26a5b620 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/generic/998 > @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# Copyright (c) 2020 Huawei. All Rights Reserved. > +# > +# FS QA Test 998 > +# > +# Test race between listxattr() and setxattr(). It reproduces a bug > +# on UBIFS where listxattr() copies the newly created xattr names > +# regardless of the remaining buffer size, fails the assertion of > +# used buffer size, and may corrupt buffer memory. > +# > +seq=`basename $0` > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > + > +here=`pwd` > +tmp=/tmp/$$ > +status=1 # failure is the default! > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > + > +_cleanup() > +{ > + cd / > + rm -f $tmp.* > + rm -f $TEST_DIR/$seq > +} > + > +# get standard environment, filters and checks > +. ./common/rc > +. ./common/attr > + > +# remove previous $seqres.full before test > +rm -f $seqres.full > + > +# real QA test starts here > +_supported_fs generic > +_supported_os Linux > +_require_attrs > + > +target=$TEST_DIR/$seq > +touch $target > + > +# start a background listxattr > +runfile="$tmp.listxattr" > +touch $runfile > +while [ -e $runfile ]; do > + ${GETFATTR_PROG} $target >/dev/null 2>&1 Er, if the listxattr corrupts the buffer memory, how does this test detect that? Does the kernel crash or something? > +done & > + > +# add new xattr continuously > +largename=`for i in $(seq 0 128); do echo -n a; done` > +cnt=100 > +# f2fs has limited spaces for xattr > +[ $FSTYP == "f2fs" ] && cnt=30 > +for i in $(seq 1 $cnt); do > + ${SETFATTR_PROG} -n user.${largename}.$i -v $i $target Seeing as each filesystem has different xattr limits, I wonder if instead of special casing of f2fs we ought to capture the stdout/stderr of SETFATTR_PROG and filter out the ENOSPC message? AFAICT this test isn't trying to check that setting xattrs succeeds, but I'm a little confused on how we detect the corrupted buffer... --D > +done > + > +rm -f $runfile > +wait > /dev/null 2>&1 > +rm -f $target > + > +echo Silence is golden > + > +# success, all done > +status=0 > +exit > diff --git a/tests/generic/998.out b/tests/generic/998.out > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..d2679ae0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/generic/998.out > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +QA output created by 998 > +Silence is golden > diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group > index d9ab9a31..62697ac5 100644 > --- a/tests/generic/group > +++ b/tests/generic/group > @@ -605,3 +605,4 @@ > 600 auto quick quota > 601 auto quick quota > 602 auto quick encrypt > +998 auto quick attr > -- > 2.25.0.4.g0ad7144999 >