Re: invalid user 123456-fsgqa

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:37:18PM +0200, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Some tests require a second user named 123456-fsgqa
> (generic/{381,383,597,598}) but that username is invalid on some Linux
> systems (SUSE distros at least) where a username cannot start with a
> digit.
> 
> Would it be ok to send a patch to change that second user to "fsgqa2"?

No.

For g/381 and g/383, the 123456-fsgqa is necessary, they test xfs_quota with
user/group name beginning with digits, they're known bug coverage. If you system
can't create a user name likes 123456-fsgqa, just skip that. I think if your
system doesn't have 123456-fsgqa, the g/381 and g/383 will _notrun automatically,
right?

I don't learn about g/597,598(Eric might know that), if some other cases just
need another user name, you can have fsgqa2 or anyother names. But please update
README, if you change that.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
> GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97  8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux