On 5/18/20 9:42 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> +test_symlink()
>>> +{
>>> + ln -s $TEST_DIR/$seq/target $TEST_DIR/$seq/sticky_dir/symlink
>>> + chown $OTHER.$OTHER $TEST_DIR/$seq/sticky_dir
>>> + chown $OWNER.$OWNER $TEST_DIR/$seq/sticky_dir/symlink
>>> + # If we can read the target, we followed the link
>>> + sudo -u $OTHER cat $TEST_DIR/$seq/sticky_dir/symlink 2>&1 \
>> Use _user_do instead of sudo?
> but OTHER is "fsgqa2;" _user_do uses "fsgqa" .... hrm. I suppose I could
> update _user_do to take a username, but is it worth it?
>
> Maybe I should just make one of the users root, I'm just worried about accidentally
> running into admin capabilities...
Actually I'll just re-use 123456-fsgq for OWNER, then OTHER can be fsgqa, and
I'll use _user_do.
Thanks,
-Eric
