On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:11:19PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > If we can't create the 60T sparse image for testing repair on a large fs > (such as when running on 32-bit), don't bother running the rest of the > test. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/xfs/020 | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/020 b/tests/xfs/020 > index 61da4101..e39c3482 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/020 > +++ b/tests/xfs/020 > @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ echo "Silence is golden" > > fsfile=$TEST_DIR/fsfile.$seq > rm -f $fsfile > +truncate -s 60t $fsfile || _notrun "Cannot create 60T sparse file for test." Um, this got committed with "xfs_io -x -c 'truncate 60t' and not as written, which means that this test does not work on i386 because xfs_io doesn't return nonzero when the truncate syscall fails. Will send patch. --D > +rm -f $fsfile > > $MKFS_PROG -t xfs -d size=60t,file,name=$fsfile >/dev/null > $XFS_REPAIR_PROG -f -o ag_stride=32 -t 1 $fsfile >/dev/null 2>&1 >
