Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] generic: add test for non-root use of fscrypt API additions

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:20:57AM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:25:42AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> > > Hi Eric,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:16:40AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > Test non-root use of the fscrypt filesystem-level encryption keyring and
> > > > v2 encryption policies.
> > > 
> > > This testcase now fails on latest Linus tree with latest e2fsprogs
> > > on ext4:
> > > 
> > > FSTYP         -- ext4
> > > PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 dell-pesc430-01 5.4.0+ #1 SMP Mon Nov 25 16:40:55 EST 2019
> > > MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sda3
> > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sda3 /mnt/xfstests/mnt2
> > > generic/581	- output mismatch (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/581.out.bad)
> > >     --- tests/generic/581.out	2019-11-25 20:30:04.536051638 -0500
> > >     +++ /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/581.out.bad	2019-11-26 01:04:17.318332220 -0500
> > >     @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> > >      Added encryption key
> > >      Added encryption key
> > >      Added encryption key
> > >     -Error adding encryption key: Disk quota exceeded
> > >     +Added encryption key
> > >      
> > >      # Adding key as root
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > A rough looking back shows that this probably started since your fscrypt
> > > update for 5.5, added support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies.
> > > 
> > > I guess you are aware of this :-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Nope, this has been passing for me.  I don't see how this can have anything to
> > do with the fscrypt update for 5.5.  I'm guessing this is a race condition in
> > the test caused by the kernel's keyrings subsystem reclaiming the keys quota
> > asynchronously.  I'll see if I can find a way to reproduce it and make the test
> > more reliable.
> 
> OK, Thanks for the info. I'll try to bisect.
> 

Can you check whether the test passes reliably for you if you apply
https://lkml.kernel.org/fstests/20200129004251.133747-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx/?

Thanks,

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux