On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 16:52 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH v2] generic: Add a test for basic F_SETLEASE functionality > > > > Add a new test that verifies that F_SETLEASE works as expected. The parent > > opens a file and sets a lease on it and then forks. The child then does a > > (possibly) conflicting open. We then verify that we get signals as expected. > > Jeff, does this mean you would rather go with this test vs the one I submitted? > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg12449.html > > Ira > No, actually...I'm sorry, I didn't notice your posting until just now. I think your test (with the proposed changes) covers more cases and will probably be more extensible later. I'll give it a more thorough review tomorrow, but I expect we can just drop this patch and just go with your tests. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
