On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 18:49 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:55 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > cephfs exposes some information via virtual xattrs and their presence > > causes this test to fail. When running on cephfs, only search for > > specific xattr classes to ensure that we skip the ceph.* ones. > > > > Probably too late to ask this question now anyway, but does ceph have > a particular good reason to expose those virt xattr in listxattr? > > I means its not xattrs that copy tools should try to copy and tools > should know about them and can try to getxattr without the need > to see them in listxattr. > > I noticed this is the behavior of cifs w.r.t cifs. and smb3. virt xattr. > Good question. I don't see the need for us to present these in listxattr and stopping that may be the best solution here. Let me investigate that approach. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
