on 2019/06/13 0:21, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:44:44PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
Hi Eryu, Darrick
Currently, on lastest kernel, generic/473 fails ,as below:
# ./check generic/473
FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
PLATFORM -- 5.2.0-rc4+
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda11
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch
generic/473 2s ... - output mismatch (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/473.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/473.out 2019-06-12 19:30:37.219753498 +0800
+++ /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/473.out.bad 2019-06-12 20:34:12.499984113 +0800
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
1: [256..287]: hole
Hole + Data
0: [0..127]: hole
-1: [128..255]: data
+1: [128..135]: data
Hole + Data + Hole
0: [0..127]: hole
I have seen previous mail[1]that mentioned "new ranged fiemap test (generic/473) fails on XFS, because there's no
final decision on the expected behavior yet and discussion has stalled somehow.". This case has been merged in 2017.12,
but this case also fails on lastest kernel, does it have any update or I miss something?
Nope, you haven't missed anything. The FIEMAP documentation says that
filesystems /can/ report more data than the range requested, but XFS
and ext4 still differ as to whether or not they will.
--D
Hi Darrick
Thanks. I got it.
more question:
xfs/107 and xfs/136 also fail on lastest kernel on my machine.
Hi Eryu, Darrick
These cases(xfs/107, xfs/136) are too old and they still fail on lastest kernel.
Can you give me more information about them?
xfs/107 fail information
+++ /var/lib/xfstests/results//xfs/107.out.bad 2019-06-13 14:33:03.345457763 +0800
@@ -9,1542 +9,980 @@
### populate filesystem
### initial report
[SCR_DEV] ([SCR_MNT]) Project:
+ 96168 #0
+ 4968 #3
+ 4344 #1
+ 3804 #2
...
xfs/136 fail information
+++ /var/lib/xfstests/results//xfs/136.out.bad 2019-06-13 14:30:14.662466225 +0800
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 136
-inum=67
+inum=131
core.format = 2 (extents)
core.size = 0
core.extsize = 0
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
...
Thanks
[1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg08426.html
