On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:03:09PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:50:08AM +0800, Xiong Zhou wrote: > > Because NFS handles this differently, returning different values. > > Details: > > http://people.redhat.com/bcodding/nfs/2016/10/07/nfs_xfstest_generic/#generic294 > > > > Signed-off-by: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sorry for the so long delay.. Not at all, :) Sending v2. Thanks, Xiong > > --- > > tests/generic/294 | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/294 b/tests/generic/294 > > index b74579ac..f7e763a3 100755 > > --- a/tests/generic/294 > > +++ b/tests/generic/294 > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ _cleanup() > > . ./common/filter > > > > # real QA test starts here > > +[ $FSTYP == "nfs" ] && _notrun "NFS behaves differently, breaks golden output" > > I think it's better to filter the output of NFS to follow the golden > output, so when NFS changes behavior, filter fails and we could know > that from test failure. > > Thanks, > Eryu > > > > > # Modify as appropriate. > > _supported_fs generic > > -- > > 2.21.0 > >
