Re: [PATCH] common/populate: decrease the step of rm file

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 2019/4/4 6:43, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:48:59PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
  Now that we have allocated 2*4096*64/16(32768) inodes after "Inode btree",
  but the step of rm file is too large to create enough free inodes in agi.
  So the freecount is not enough large to make free_level gt 1 and call
  _scratch__populate on xfs will report the following failure(such as xfs/083):

Failed to create fino of sufficient height!

By decreasing the step of rm file, xfs/083 will pass.
Hmm, what are MOUNT_OPTS and MKFS_OPTIONS when this happens?  Are you
running on top of some kind of RAID or 4k sector disk or something?
   The mkfs and mount option as below:
   MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda11
   MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch

   I run this case on anordinary  disk, in xfs/083.full, the disk information as below:
   meta-data=/dev/sda11             isize=512    agcount=4, agsize=1310720 blks
            =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
            =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
            =                       reflink=1
   data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=5242880, imaxpct=25
            =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
   naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
   log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
            =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
   realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
   + populate fs image
   MOUNT_OPTIONS =  -o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota

   fdisk -l /dev/sda
   Disk /dev/sda: 298.1 GiB, 320072933376 bytes, 625142448 sectors
   Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
   Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
   I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
   Disklabel type: dos
   Disk identifier: 0x00039ec7

   /dev/sda11      553664512 595607551  41943040    20G 83 Linux


I think this patch looks ok but I'm puzzled for why a step of
$(ino_per_rec + 1) isn't enough.

--D

  Hi Darrick

  Sorry, I am not aware that the count mechanism of agi_free_level. IMO, agi_free_count achives a
   threshold that current free inode btree level can notstore free inode information(I want to search the threshold in kernel,but fail).
  Then, free_level will add.

  on my machine, I decrease the step. When the value of step is 2,4,8,16, the free count becomes larger
  and the free_level turns into 2.

  a step of $(ino_per_rec + 1) isn't enough. It maynot fill up current agi_free_level because it doesn't create enough free inodes
 (allocat,free,not unused inodes).

  Thanks,
  Yang Xu

Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  common/populate | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/populate b/common/populate
index 4fa118f0..7403dec3 100644
--- a/common/populate
+++ b/common/populate
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ _scratch_xfs_populate() {
  		touch "${dir}/${f}"
  	done

-	seq 0 "$((ino_per_rec + 1))" "${nr}" | while read f; do
+	seq 0 2 "${nr}" | while read f; do
  		rm -f "${dir}/${f}"
  	done

--
2.18.1











[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux