Re: [PATCH RFC] fstests: btrfs: Test if balance takes too long time or return -ENOSPC unexpected

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:20:43PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Kernel commit 64403612b73a ("btrfs: rework
> btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs") is introducing a regression for
> btrfs balance performance.
> 
> Originally, the workload used in the test case only takes seconds for
> balance on v4.20 while now it takes over 400 seconds for balance.
> 
> During that 400 seconds balance, it commits over 2000 transactions just
> for nothing, compare to original several transactions.
> 
> Add test cases to detect such regression.

How do you detect that the test regressed, other than comparing the
runtime recorded between runs of the testsuite? I don't actually know
how this could be done inside the script, as there can't be a fixed
number of seconds to compare with. The run time depends on the
underlying storage.

I takes 14 seconds on a physical machine on a rotational disk and 9
seconds on a SSD.

Other than the, I've used this test to validate the fix, for that

Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>

It would be good to have the test in the testsuite so possibly some
large timeout can be set and the test will print a message, this should
catch attention at least and let us decide.

> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Extra note:
> In fact, without the snapshots created in the test case, it would return
> -ENOSPC even we have enough unallocated space.
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/180     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/180.out |  2 ++
>  tests/btrfs/group   |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/180
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/180.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/180 b/tests/btrfs/180
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..534fea01
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/180
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (C) 2019 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 180
> +#
> +# Test if metadata balance would take forever to finish or return ENOSPC even
> +# there there are tons of space.
> +#
> +# This is regression caused by upstream commit 64403612b73a
> +# ("btrfs: rework btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs")
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_xfs_io_command falloc
> +
> +i=0
> +loop=16384
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create "$SCRATCH_MNT/src" > /dev/null
> +
> +while [ $i -le $loop ]; do
> +	# Use small file to create inline extent
> +	_pwrite_byte 0x00 0 2K "$SCRATCH_MNT/src/inline_$i" > /dev/null
> +	#$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc 0 4K" "$SCRATCH_MNT/src/regular_$i" > /dev/null

You can delete the commented command

> +	i=$((i + 1))
> +done
> +
> +# Create enough snapshots so at space reservation part of relocation, we could
> +# generate enough space pressure
> +for i in $(seq -w 0 16); do
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot "$SCRATCH_MNT/src" \
> +		"$SCRATCH_MNT/snapshot_$i" > /dev/null
> +	# touch random files to create some new tree blocks
> +	for j in $(seq -w 0 16); do
> +		victim="$(ls $SCRATCH_MNT/snapshot_$i | sort -R | head -n1)"
> +		touch "$SCRATCH_MNT/snapshot_$i/$victim"
> +	done
> +done
> +
> +# Balancing metadata shouldn't be too time consuming, as the amount of metadata
> +# is less than 8M, thus normally it should finish very quick.
> +#
> +# However with that offending commit, it will take forever to finish or return
> +# ENOSPC after a long wait.
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance start -m "$SCRATCH_MNT" > /dev/null
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/180.out b/tests/btrfs/180.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..50aba766
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/180.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 180
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 46dd3c95..e724968b 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -182,3 +182,4 @@
>  177 auto quick swap balance
>  178 auto quick send
>  179 auto qgroup dangerous
> +180 auto balance dangerous

I don't think it falls to the dangerous category, it does not crash the
machine, only that the test could take long.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux