On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:12:12PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:54:20PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > If you use a hostname which is part of the output of > > standard tools you end up with failures with fstests > > due to differences in output against the golden output. > > > > The failures are false positives due to the hostname. > > For instance if you hostname is 'xfs' _dump_filter_main() > > will substitute the initiial 'xfs' with HOSTNAME as part > > of your logs, and will fail the output will fail against > > the golden output on say all xfsdump / xfsrestores tests. > > > > The hostname must be a unique string, not used as part > > of the output from any tool used when capturing output. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > > IMHO, a better fix would be improving the regexp in _dump_filter_main to > match hostname more precisely. I did the following update and it seemed > to work fine, I tested with '-g dump' and all tests passed (some tests > _notrun due to missing tape device). > > --- a/common/dump > +++ b/common/dump > @@ -826,7 +826,8 @@ _dump_filter_main() > -e "s#$__XFSDUMP_PROG#xfsdump#" \ > -e "s#$XFSRESTORE_PROG#xfsrestore#" \ > -e "s#$XFSINVUTIL_PROG#xfsinvutil#" \ > - -e "s/`hostname`/HOSTNAME/" \ > + -e "s/`hostname`:/HOSTNAME:/" \ > + -e "s/: `hostname`/: HOSTNAME/" \ > -e "s#$SCRATCH_DEV#SCRATCH_DEV#" \ > -e "s#$SCRATCH_RAWDEV#SCRATCH_DEV#" \ > -e "s#$dumptape#TAPE_DEV#" \ > > It's based on the fact that there're basically two patterns that contain > 'HOSTNAME': > > xfsrestore: hostname: HOSTNAME > xfsdump: level 0 dump of HOSTNAME:SCRATCH_MNT Works for me but this is still pretty fragile, and it does not cover the what other filesystems use as best-practices for issuign a hostname either. Even if we consider xfs: are we *certain* that the above regexp covers all output issued by xfs utils when hostname is used? We're talking about a generic rule of thumb here. So I'd say we do both for now. Just my 0.01 CRC. Luis