Re: Any way to detect performance in a test case?

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]




On 2019/1/23 下午12:18, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:51:03AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019/1/17 上午10:25, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:30:19AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> On 2019/1/17 上午8:16, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:47:21PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>>> E.g. one operation should finish in 30s, but when it takes over 300s,
>>>>>> it's definitely a big regression.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But considering how many different hardware/VM the test may be run on,
>>>>>> I'm not really confident if this is possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can really only determine performance regressions by comparing
>>>>> test runtime on kernels with the same features set run on the same
>>>>> hardware. Hence you'll need to keep archives from all your test
>>>>> machiens and configs and only compare between matching
>>>>> configurations.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, this matches my current understanding of how the testsuite works.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like such regression detection can only be implemented outside
>>>> of fstests.
>>>
>>> That's pretty much by design. Analysis of multiple test run results
>>> and post-processing them is really not something that the test
>>> harness does. The test harness really just runs the tests and
>>> records the results....
>>
>> What about using some other telemetry other than time to determine
>> regreesion?
>>
>> In my particular case, the correct behavior, some reading like
>> generation would only increase by a somewhat predictable number.
>>
>> While when the regression happens, the generation will go way higher
>> than expectation.
> 
> That's something that would be done inside the test, right? i.e.
> this has nothing to do with the test harness itself, but is a
> failure criteria for the specific test?

Yep, a failure criteria for that specific test.

> 
>> Is it acceptable to craft a test case using such measurement?
> 
> If it's reliable and not prone to false positives from future code
> changes, yes.

Glad to know that.

Thanks,
Qu
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux