On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:33 PM <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
>
> btrfs/131 tests the free space tree, which older kernels won't have. We
> shouldn't run there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Looks good. Since it's a btrfs specific change/fix, it would have been
a good idea to cc linux-btrfs.
> ---
> tests/btrfs/131 | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/131 b/tests/btrfs/131
> index 0da1e7be..3de7eef8 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/131
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/131
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ _supported_fs btrfs
> _supported_os Linux
> _require_scratch
> _require_btrfs_command inspect-internal dump-super
> +_require_btrfs_fs_feature free_space_tree
>
> mkfs_v1()
> {
> --
> 2.16.4
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
