On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:56:09AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3.01.19 г. 12:01 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > Commit 7fc034868d5d ("common/config: create $RESULT_BASE before dumping kmemleak leaks")
> > > inadvertently broke $RESULT_BASE dir creation since it changed the logic
> > > to only create the directory only if this variable is not explicitly set
> > > by the user. Fix this by ensuring RESULT_BASE is always created.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Eryu,
> >
> > I think Johannes' commit should actually be reverted. Currently
> > get_next_config is called at the beginning of the section code _AFTER_
> > _init_kmemleak so it's not really fixing the problem that Johannes
> > described. So care to revert his commit ?
>
> Yes, the original commit should be reverted. Using RESULT_BASE in
> the way that init_kmemleak is using it is fundamentally broken.
> Using RESULTS_BASE is incorrect - harness run state is supposed to
> be stored in the section-aware RESULTS_DIR (e.g. see
> _require_scratch()) which is constant and always exists for each
> section that is run.
>
> The code was architectected this way because section definitions can
> change RESULT_BASE, and that means the RESULT_BASE defined when
> init_kmemleak() is called may not point to the same location as when
> check_memleak() is called. Hence check_memleak will never run if a
> section definition changes RESULT_BASE.
>
> IOWs, the init_kmemleak() call needs to be done inside the
> section iteration loop, after the section config has been parsed and
> we've determined if the the section will be run. This is where the
> original code created RESULT_BASE if it didn't exist. Further, all
> the section run state is then stored in RESULTS_DIR, which is
> created from the current RESULT_BASE (e.g. see _require_scratch,
> check_dmesg, etc).
>
> Hence init_kmemleak() and check_kmemleak() should have a scope
> inside a valid RESULT_DIR path. And once this is done, you can then
However, the scope of RESULT_DIR is per-test, not per-section. Either
we'd have to hoist the creation of RESULT_DIR above the "for seq in
$list..." or engage in some egregious hacks to get this set up before
we loop through the tests.
The other problem with kmemleak is that it takes a while for the scanner
to notice leaks (hence all the "read report twice" crap code) which
means we'd really don't want to be cycling it on and off repeatedly,
because that causes it to lose leaks periodically. It works best when
you turn it on once and sample every now and then.
Frankly, the kmemleak mechanism is just grody and unreliable enough that
I'm tempted to ask Eryu to rip it out entirely. But, I'll give one go
at fixing it, since I wrote it...
--D
> add a USE_KMEMLEAK section variable to turn kmemleak detection on
> and off via the config file on a per-section basis.....
>
> So, IMO, the correct thing to do here is revert the original broken
> change and fix the kmemleak infrastructure to be properly aware of
> config sections.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
