On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 03:21:15PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 01:59:31PM -0700, Luis R. Chamberlain wrote: > > > The best I've been able to > > > do is now merged into Kent's ktest -- but you're not based on that, > > > so I'll try and get your ostest set up to work with DAX. Or maybe Ross > > > can do it since he's actually been able to get 2MB pages working and I > > > still haven't :-( > > > > Patches and new sections to cover more ground indeed are appreciated! > > I feel like we need to merge ktest and oscheck. oscheck assumes that you > know how to set up qemu, and ktest takes care of setting up qemu for you. > I think it might be possible to turn oscheck into a set of ktest > tests. Everyone uses their own qemu based solution, it just so happens that I was also not satisfied with what I saw and wrote my own solution, kvm-boot [0]. I'm sure others use other things too. But... a qemu-less solution for a lot of tests would be great as well, and for this I believe kunit [1] seems to be like a great possibility worth exploring in the future. [0] https://gitlab.com/mcgrof/kvm-boot [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10704147/ Luis
