On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:26:00AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > If btrfs need to be tested at its default blockgroup which is non-mixed, > then it needs at least 256mb. > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2->v3: > separated from the patch set of 9. > notrun for the cases where filler is not big enough to fill the > fssize. > v2->v1: ref the cover-letter of the set. > > tests/generic/077 | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/generic/077 b/tests/generic/077 > index ef6af18c83e3..784afe448940 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/077 > +++ b/tests/generic/077 > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ echo "QA output created by $seq" > here=`pwd` > tmp=/tmp/$$ > status=1 > -# Something w/ enough data to fill 50M of fs... > +# Something w/ enough data to fill 256M of fs... > filler=/lib/modules/ > > # fall back in case /lib/modules doesn't exist > @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ _supported_os Linux > > [ ! -d $filler ] && _notrun "No directory to source files from" > > +# check if two iterations of the assigned filler is big enough to fill fssize > +fs_size=$((256 * 1024 * 1024)) > +[ $(( $(du -h -m /usr | tail -1| cut -f1) * 2 )) -lt 256 ] && \ Err... what does measuring /usr have to do with /lib/modules? Also, /lib/modules is 58M on my test VM, which means that a 256M filesystem isn't going to ENOSPC. (Though weirdly it doesn't fail despite the lack of ENOSPC even at the 50M size, so I'm not sure what this test is actually supposed to do...) --D > + _notrun "filler $filler isn't big enough to fill fssize $fssize" > + > _require_scratch > _require_attrs > _require_acls > @@ -49,9 +54,7 @@ rm -f $seqres.full > _scratch_unmount >/dev/null 2>&1 > echo "*** MKFS ***" >>$seqres.full > echo "" >>$seqres.full > -SIZE=`expr 50 \* 1024 \* 1024` > -_scratch_mkfs_sized $SIZE >>$seqres.full 2>&1 \ > - || _fail "mkfs failed" > +_scratch_mkfs_sized $fs_size >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed" > _scratch_mount > mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/subdir > > -- > 1.8.3.1 >
