On 26.09.2018 07:07, Anand Jain wrote: > > > On 09/25/2018 06:51 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 25.09.2018 07:24, Anand Jain wrote: >>> As of now _scratch_mkfs_sized() checks if the requested size is below 1G >>> and forces the --mixed option for the mkfs.btrfs. Well the correct size >>> considering all possible group profiles at which we need to force the >>> mixed option is roughly 256Mbytes. So fix that. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Have you considered the implications of this w.r.t commit >> d4da414a9a9d ("common/rc: raise btrfs mixed mode threshold to 1GB") >> >> Initially this threshold was 100mb then Omar changed it to 1g. Does this >> change affect generic/427? > > d4da414a9a9d does not explain what was the problem that Omar wanted to > address, mainly what was the failure about. I just retested on upstream 4.19.0-rc3 with Omar's patch reverted (so anything above 100m for fs size is created with non-mixed block groups) and the test succeeded. So indeed your change seems to not make a difference for this test. > > And no it does not affect. I have verified generic/427 with kernel 4.1 > and 4.19-rc5 with btrfs-progs 4.1, 4.9 and latest from kdave they all > run fine. Good to integrate. > > Thanks, Anand > >> >>> --- >>> common/rc | 5 ++++- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc >>> index d5bb1feee2c3..90dc3002bc3d 100644 >>> --- a/common/rc >>> +++ b/common/rc >>> @@ -969,7 +969,10 @@ _scratch_mkfs_sized() >>> ;; >>> btrfs) >>> local mixed_opt= >>> - (( fssize <= 1024 * 1024 * 1024 )) && mixed_opt='--mixed' >>> + # minimum size that's needed without the mixed option. >>> + # Ref: btrfs-prog: btrfs_min_dev_size() >>> + # Non mixed mode is also the default option. >>> + (( fssize < $((256 * 1024 *1024)) )) && mixed_opt='--mixed' >>> $MKFS_BTRFS_PROG $MKFS_OPTIONS $mixed_opt -b $fssize $SCRATCH_DEV >>> ;; >>> jfs) >>> >