Re: [ANNOUNCE] fstests: master branch updated to 42b851446ff1

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Eryu Guan <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 10:42:19AM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
>> Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2018年7月2日周一 上午10:25写道:
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 09:07:51PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > The master branch of the xfstests repository at:
>> > >
>> > >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git
>> > >
>> > > have just been updated. This update contains 8 new tests mainly for xfs and
>> > > btrfs, but they all should pass with latest Linus tree. Others are random
>> > > updates including license update to src/log-writes/* and fixes to build
>> > > infrastructure.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Eryu
>> > >
>> > > The new head of the master branch is commit:
>> > >
>> > > 42b851446ff1 build: remove <attr/xattr.h> check
>> > >
>> > > New commits:
>> > >
>> > > Darrick J. Wong (2):
>> > >       [e04c7b7e3021] xfs/365: fuzz inobt in ag 1
>> > >       [494b07e34015] xfs: regression test for rmapbt fdblocks accounting problems
>> > >
>> > > Filipe Manana (1):
>> > >       [89ee377df5f2] btrfs: test power failure while qgroups rescan is in progress
>> > >
>> > > Josef Bacik (1):
>> > >       [a0f89557ca46] fstests: add SPDX license comments for src/log-writes/*
>> > >
>> > > Lu Fengqi (3):
>> > >       [d61c29d32fab] fsstress: remove include <attr/xattr.h>
>> > >       [652fda3ee172] src/t_immutable: use sys/xattr.h instead of attr/xattr.h
>> > >       [42b851446ff1] build: remove <attr/xattr.h> check
>> >
>> > The current xfstests-dev always fails on building time:
>> >
>> > configure.ac:56: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_NEED_GETXATTR_LIBATTR
>> >       If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
>> >       See the Autoconf documentation.
>> > make: *** [configure] Error 1
>> >
>> > After reverting "[42b851446ff1] build: remove <attr/xattr.h> check", everything
>> > goes well.
>> >
>> > Is there following fix about this? Or did I do something wrong?
>
> That's weird, I didn't see compiling errors in my release testing on any
> of the three distros I tested (CentOS7.4, Debian sid and Fedora 28). But
> now I did see the errors..
>

My experience is that 'make' failed but 'make clean; make' did fine.

Thanks,
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux