On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:37:58AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 25-05-18 11:30:34, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:30:55PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Currently 'new' script sources common/config which tries to find mkfs > > > and fails if not found (which is likely for non-root user). This is > > > inconvenient as development usually does not happen as root. In fact the > > > vast majority of setup in common/config and common/rc is not necessary > > > for 'new'. Split out the necessary bits into new common/config-base and > > > use it in 'new'. Cleanup common/rc and common/config now that it's only > > > used from 'check'. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > .... > > > --- a/common/rc > > > +++ b/common/rc > > > @@ -20,18 +20,9 @@ > > > # Mountain View, CA 94043, USA, or: http://www.sgi.com > > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -BC=$(which bc 2> /dev/null) || BC= > > > +. common/config > > > > Doesn't this means we now include common/config in every test setup > > routine, even though the environment it sets up is inherited from > > the check function. > > What you describe was happening already in the past AFAICT. The test gets > executed as "./$seq" so only exported variables are inherited. Thus 'iam' > variable is not set when executing the test and therefore common/rc was > already including common/config. Also including common/config in each test > is even required to get functions declared there. Am I missing something? No, I just read the code incorrectly. The way common/config gets included is a maze of twisty passages - I'll go back and look at the patch again... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
